Call to use vacant aged care beds to free up hospitals for COVID
An aged care consultancy and technology provider has suggested spare aged care beds and the sector’s skilled workforce could be used to look after older hospital patients.
An aged care consultancy and technology provider has suggested spare aged care beds and the sector’s skilled workforce could be used to look after older hospital patients.
Mirus Australia said the government could facilitate the initiative by funding a matching service and reducing red tape.
Mirus Australia co-founder James Price said the proposal was about a better alignment of the hospital outpatient process and the residential aged care admission’s process.
“There’s something like 15,000 potential vacancies in aged care if we take the premise that 91 per cent is the national occupancy figure and there is about 220,000 beds,” Mr Price told Australian Ageing Agenda.
“If there is that spare capacity in aged care, wouldn’t it make sense to make that capacity more freely available to the hospitals so they can make a decision on could they move some of the elderly patients into aged care?
“Obviously not those who are on critical life support, but those who could be adequately professionally cared for in aged care,” Mr Price said.
The hospital patients could be close to discharge, palliative care or in need of complex health care for non-life-threatening conditions such as diabetes, pain or wound management, enteral feeding or oxygen.
These conditions are already treated in aged care, Mirus pointed out.
Proposal needs funding, less red tape
Mr Price said many facilities are well-tuned into accessing additional staff when needed and would be able to respond.
While there is often a premium for getting staff in at short notice, the argument is it costs governments $250 a day to look after someone in aged care but it is $2,000 in a hospital, he said.
Government can support this proposal by sponsoring a broker service so someone could ring around hospitals to offer aged care beds and by topping up costs providers may experience with agency staff, Mr Price said.
“And then the third thing, which is a key barrier, is any paperwork associated with ACAT to get a resident into aged care needs to be dropped in favour of emergency respite rules,” Mr Price said.
This would address a current challenge of the typical two-week Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) process to enter residential aged care, he said.
“If they don’t have an aged care client record then they won’t get funded. That needs to be made easier. It’s just red tape,” Mr Price said.
“If people think this is a good idea, we can help.”
Provider offers empty floor
Diverting patients to available aged care beds makes sense to Michelle Sloane, chief operating officer of NSW aged care provider SummitCare.
“We have the capacity clearly in our homes. We understand that the hospitals need to stop any bed blockages to accommodate the critically ill people coming in with COVID-19,” Ms Sloane told AAA.
Hospitals are the main referal sources for the provider, she said.
Ms Sloane said she and her leadership team have already reached out to Sydney hospitals to notify them about available beds.
“We have a floor at [SummitCare] Baulkham Hills that has yet to be commissioned; an entire floor. We thought it would be a perfect site if people wanted to discharge, particularly slow-stream rehab patients.
“Besides aged care patients, which we are always very happy to accommodate, if they had other patients who just wanted to be somewhere where they could rehabilitate themselves, then we have a whole floor,” she said.
Ms Sloane said they hadn’t received a huge response back, but that was likely because hospitals didn’t yet have an immediate need.
“Although our normal channels through the hospitals have been busy,” she said.
Comment on the story below. Follow Australian Ageing Agenda on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, sign up to our twice-weekly newsletter and subscribe to AAA magazine for the complete aged care picture.
why would put elderly at risk.most vulnerable in society .
A win-win for all concerned in these toughest of times!
We should be working to minimise the risks to our clients, not increasing them. Any patient coming from a hospital environment must serve a 14 day quarantine, even if they test negative.
Wouldn’t it be riskier for an older person to be a hospital?
It’s a really stupid idea, (no matter how, it’s dressed up with words).
This is just a disgraceful ploy, to kill of the elderly.
It is easy to blame ACAT for delays in assessment from hospital to aged care facility but is an outdated argument. I work for ACAT in Qld and ACAT is assessing clients referred on average within 48 hours. Sometimes on the same day as referral and delegated and approved same day as assessment. Any solution needs to be based on up to date facts and not throw away statements.
Proving this service through hotels is a far safer and productive option.
There would perhaps be some hesitation from hotel owners however it would serve the purpose of lower cost, isolation of those resident and ease of care (including aged care staff dedicated to the hotel). Best to keep anyone with the virus away from aged care facilities.
FED UP don’t even bother with such ludicrous comments and let the adults have a conversation/ contribute with their ideas.
residential care facilities are not hospitals and don’t have adequate care staff with the health competencies to support such a proposal.
I don’t think is a good idea as it’s putting our staff and potentially our healthy aged care residents at risk we are trying to avoid the spread of this not increase it
I have an even better Money making idea, if the risk is so manageable, how about Michelle Sloan and her Leadership team (including James Price) offer their OWN family homes and family beds instead, to COVID-19 infected patients? They could then use the extra government funds to personally visit Wuhan for a fact finding tour
No one in this story, or the sector I would think, is suggesting that people infected with COVID-19 enter an aged care facility for any reason. That is absurd.
Sounds like a money grab.
This is regardless of the risk posed by bringing patients en masse into residential care.
I think this is such an ageist approach and it saddens me.
Stop it with ACATs being a barrier – I do work in an ACAT and are inpatients are assessed within 24 hours and emergency respite is to used when there is an emergency.
Older hospital patients have the same rights as younger patients.