Campaign against aged care funding cuts intensifies

Fallout from the Federal Government’s budget measures to claw back aged care spending continues with more sector stakeholders calling for a halt to the cuts.

Fallout from the Federal Government’s budget measures to claw back aged care spending continues with more sector stakeholders calling for a halt to the cuts.

Aged care providers and unions have ramped up their criticism of the changes to the Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) made in December and May – worth a total of $1.7 billion – with lobbying of the government, department and opposition intensifying.

John Kelly
John Kelly

National provider peak Aged & Community Services Australia launched a new campaign yesterday calling on the major political parties to halt the cuts.

ACSA CEO Adjunct Professor John Kelly said the recent $1.2 billion budget changes targeting medication and pain management would directly impact the care of residents.

“Aged care needs more funding and more staffing, not less. At a time when we should be building and developing the workforce of the future we are faced with losing skilled nurses and care workers and allied health programs,” Professor Kelly said.

He said the cuts will impact on the level of care and support that can be provided to residents.

‘Care compromised’

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) also called on all parties to restore the funding, saying its worst fears had come true in response to a story published on AAA online on Wednesday.

That story featured Scalabrini Village CEO Chris Rigby who said his organisation would see an 11.3 per cent reduction in annual funding as a result of the cuts, which would make it impossible to maintain the current number of registered nurses employed.

Lee Thomas
Lee Thomas

ANMF federal secretary Lee Thomas said Mr Rigby’s comments confirmed that ongoing funding cuts would compromise the level of care for residents.

The ANMF had been warning of this potential outcome for the past three years, she added.

“Sadly, it’s now reality with this terrible admission that the number of RNs will be reduced and that patients with complex health issues and high care needs won’t be able to be cared for by this provider,” Ms Thomas said.

“As we know, the sector is suffering a shortfall of 20,000 nurses and our members on the ground are telling us that it’s now not [un]common for one RN to be looking after 100 patients in a nursing home – it seems that’s about to get even worse.

“In the lead-up to the election, we’re calling on the government, the opposition and the Greens to commit to restoring funding so we can avoid highly-qualified RNs losing their jobs – and ensure our elderly mums and mads and grandparents get the quality care they deserve.”

Wendy Rocks
Wendy Rocks

Several others responded to AAA’s story including Lutheran Aged Care CEO Wendy Rocks, from the southern NSW border town of Albury, who contacted AAA to add her support to Mr Rigby’s comments and pass on her comments published in the Border Mail.

She said the current funding allowed for the hiring of more registered nurses and occupational therapists to help some of the 212 residents across Lutheran Aged Care sites.

“The ACFI has done what it was put in place to do and for the first time in a long time, and I’ve been in this industry for 25 years, we’ve been able to deliver the kind of resident care that these very old, frail people require,” Mrs Rocks told the Border Mail.

Funding should reflect resident need

Meanwhile, representatives from more than 60 aged care organisations attended a Leading Age Services Australia (LASA) NSW-ACT forum in Sydney recently to discuss the repercussions of the funding cuts.

Loula Koutrodimos
Loula Koutrodimos

The consensus view was that the cuts would undermine the viability of aged care services and compromise quality care for older Australians, according to the state peak, which called for funding to reflect resident need.

“These cuts will be devastating to the aged care industry. Already providers are considering which services for residents will be affected, as well as possible reduction in staff numbers,” said Loula Koutrodimos, acting CEO of LASA NSW-ACT.

“This cut is based on repairing the budget, without consideration of the impact to resident care needs.”

Ms Koutrodimos said there was a bipartisan absence of political will to address the true care challenges of our ageing population.

“As the meeting of providers reaffirmed, funding in aged care must reflect resident need… Aged care cannot continue to be a reserve from which billions of dollars in funding is withdrawn to address other Budget concerns, or to fund other priorities,” she said.

Follow AAA online for further reports on the impact of the ACFI changes to aged care service provision.

Want to have your say on this story? Comment below. Send us your news and tip-offs to 

Subscribe to Australian Ageing Agenda magazine

Sign up to AAA newsletters

Tags: acfi, acsa, anmf, chris-rigby, john-kelly, lasa-nsw-act, lee-thomas, Loula Koutrodimos, lutheran-aged-care, Scalabrini Village, wendy-rocks,

6 thoughts on “Campaign against aged care funding cuts intensifies

  1. This is just the tip of the iceberg. $3.0b less for aged care and $3.0b more for child care. Apart from the significant reduction in aged care funding the present and ongoing reforms in aged care will mean that Government will have total control of which residents will be admitted to each residential care facility – just look at the direction CDC and myagedcare is going. It costs significantly more to care for and accommodate aged persons in acute hospital beds than in appropriately funded and resourced residential care facilities. “We have been doing so much with so little for so long that now we will attempt the impossible with nothing”.

  2. But the providers weren’t employing enough RNs before the funding cuts were made!
    They were happy to use the ACFI tool to claim every single dollar available and maximize their claims – while at the same time implying that these frail elderly patients didn’t require skilled nursing care 24/7.
    It’s normal practice for 1 RN to be responsible for 70 or more high and complex care residents.
    The system is broken. it needs to be completely overhauled, with transparency and accountability for how the funding is spent.
    We need minimum Nurse to patient ratios to ensure safety and quality. And funding linked directly to care.

  3. Maybe a system similar to the one recently introduced for community packaged care? Each resident/family member gets a financial statement each month of how the government allocated money is used in their care. That would have to include staffing, food, utilities, and any treatment which is not directly paid for my the resident/family. Two points. 1. It would show exactly how the budget is being managed, and 2. It would show the paucity and inadequacy of funding for aged care residents.

  4. Exactly, Mary. The funding cuts are appalling, but it’s a bit rich for LASA to pretend they’re concerned about care standards only a few months after they actively campaigned for the removal of RNs

    Short memories and double standards. How could anyone take them seriously?

  5. I’m an RN working in aged care and have done so for the last 23yrs, if I had my time over again I would NOT work in this industry, it is over regulated, staff are over worked, under paid, undervalued, subjected to verbal abuse from residents and families, subjected to physical abuse and expected to go the extra mile to provide the care residents require, champagne expectations on a beer income. Trying to meet the needs of the residents with little or no funding when it is clawed back off you is disgraceful, everything about resident care is compromised in these instances.

  6. I think the government should be looking at the statistics of ALL providers (not just the listed companies) in Australia as I believe it would show the majority would be struggling to stay afloat in the current conditions. Operators will have no choice but to reduce staff or shut the doors to prevent risking resident lives due to the reduced funding.

    In an aging population and a shortage of hospital beds this is not what we need from our Leaders of this country to play politics by stripping money from an industry that needs more thought and innovation to look after our aged into the future

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *