Govt rejects international convention for older people

Seniors advocates have been dealt a significant blow with the Australian Government opposing a bid for a United Nations Convention on the Rights of Older People.


Seniors advocates have been dealt a significant blow with the Australian Government opposing a bid for a United Nations Convention on the Rights of Older People.

Australia has joined other powerful UN member states including the US, the European Union and Canada in rejecting the case for a new human rights treaty.

Similar to the UN conventions on the rights of women and people with a disability, the legally binding instrument would explicitly recognise the rights of older people in international law.

A new convention on the rights of older people is currently being considered at the UN by the Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing (OEWGA), which held its most recent meeting on 30 July.

However, Australian Ageing Agenda has confirmed that the Federal Government is unlikely to support the convention.

Assistant Minister for Social Services Mitch Fifield told AAA that the Australian Government had been an active participant in UN talks but remained unconvinced that a new legal instrument was necessary.

“As there is already a range of existing international human rights treaties that provide protection for all people, the Government is not convinced that the case has been made for an additional human rights treaty specific to older people,” he said.

“This view is shared by many countries involved in the Open-Ended Working Group.”

Since the OEWGA was established in 2010, Australia’s statements to the UN on this issue have been non-committal.

The US has said it has “serious concerns” about the proposal and questioned what a new convention would add to the protections already present in existing human rights treaties.

Civil society support

At an NGO-level, seniors peak bodies such as COTA Australia and the International Federation on Ageing have been leading the campaign for a new convention. In February, the Global Alliance for the Rights of Older People Australia (GAROPA) was established with seven member organisations to raise awareness and win support on the issue.

Chair of GAROPA and CEO of COTA Victoria, Sue Hendy said a convention on the rights of older people would offer a yardstick by which to measure Australia’s performance on protecting and enabling the rights of older people.

“A convention would enable us to raise a conversation about rights in the community and put the litmus test on government policies and programs,” she told AAA.

Ms Hendy, who attended the recent UN negotiations in New York, said a convention would represent an important platform to create an attitude shift towards ageing globally.

She said some countries, particularly those member states that do not have advanced social security systems, were opposed to a convention for economic reasons and while many member states pointed to the Madrid International Plan on Active Ageing as an existing international agreement, it was not a legally binding document.

She urged the Australian public to contact their local members of parliament to build public pressure for a convention.

The proposal for a UN convention is also strongly supported by the Australian Human Rights Commission, which said a convention would increase the visibility of older Australians and guide an overarching national strategy for protecting the human rights of older people.

A regional forum attracting national human rights institutions and NGOs across the Asia-pacific will take place in Thailand at the end of the month as a way to progress the issue within the region.

Ms Hendy is facilitating an upcoming AAG webinar on strengthening human rights protections for older people with Susan Ryan, Age Discrimination Commissioner and Charles Waldegrave on 11 September. AAA is the media partner of the AAG.

Tags: AHRC, cota, human-rights, sue-hendy, UN-convention,

1 thought on “Govt rejects international convention for older people

  1. Typical response by the Government and and a very sad one at that. Elders are not protected by any form of legislation in Australia and the government aids and abets the mental, physical, chemical, financial and others forms of abuse that nursing homes commit on the elderly.
    Susan Ryan is misinformed if she thinks that current laws protect the elders, they do not. The only redress for elders is through tort and that is not open to them because of their frailty, mental and or financial position, caused or exacerbated by ‘care’ homes.
    We need specific legislation to protect the elderly from institutional abuse, which includes hospitals who often override/ignore the wishes of the medical power of attorney and proceed to administer contraindicated drugs for the elder in their charge. All institutions should be accountable for the human rights of elders and criminal sanctions should be put in place to ensure that that they adhere to the law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *