Pushback on proposal to take aged care out of government
Senior counsel assisting the aged care royal commission have made the case for the creation of an independent body that would take responsibility for aged care out of the hands of the government and its bureaucrats.
Senior counsel assisting the aged care royal commission have made the case for the creation of an independent body that would take responsibility for aged care out of the hands of the government and its bureaucrats.
In their final submission, Peter Gray QC and Peter Rozen QC recommend the establishment of an Australian Aged Care Commission independent of government and responsible for administering and regulating the aged care system.
Royal Commissioner Lynelle Briggs described the proposal as “quite extraordinary … and even courageous” and questioned whether such a move would be in the best interests of older Australians.
“I am yet to hear you present arguments, counsel, as to how the Commission model will improve the quality and safety of care for older Australians,” she said.
“Or how any such benefits would outweigh the very substantial costs and disruption involved in such a radical transformation of the government’s administrative machinery.”
Commissioner Briggs said it was important for ministers to be accountable to parliament for their performance, and aged care must be closely connected with the health system and other government services.
Also, she said that at least for the foreseeable future aged care will continue to be funded via parliamentary appropriations.
“I would expect that all governments would want clear oversight of over $20 billion in outlays,” she said.
Setting up a new aged care commission would require new legislation, new funding, a new workforce, new systems and building acquisitions, Commissioner Briggs said.
A new body would also take years to set up, divert time and money and replace “experienced and knowledgeable” staff with private sector employees and contractors.
As well as the commission model, Ms Briggs said the prospect of a ‘radically reformed’ new Department of Health and Ageing headed by a cabinet minister should be considered.
“That Department would be more proactive and more responsive in the way it engages with older people in the sector,” she said.
Within the department the secretary would be responsible for implementing the changes recommended in the Royal Commission’s final report, which will be handed down next year.
The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission would remain a separate government body, Ms Briggs said, but it would be “reconstituted and revitalised” as an independent authority and the “tough cop on the beat”.
However fellow commissioner Tony Pagone said his colleague’s remarks were not a “final decision”.
“I suspect that my own view is much closer aligned to that which you put forward,” he told counsel.
Access Counsel Assisting’s submissions here.
This story first ran on Government News.
Comment on the story below. Follow Australian Ageing Agenda on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, sign up to our twice-weekly newsletter and subscribe to AAA magazine for the complete aged care picture.
Get you hands off our elderly, Health and aged care should be for the people and regulated by Accountable by Australian Government.
Never acceptable for Private corporations, Shame on you for willing to recommend to sell of responsibility, how very un- Australian .
Interesting proposal, great to stimulate debate and ideas on this issue, those on the front line of aged care management, as I was for a long time, know the challenges and beauracratic bungling that goes on when dealing with this government agency, you spend a lot of time and money on utter crap and vexatious complaints. The private sector is often more savvy and forward thinking in its management style and this is what Aged Care needs. The longer the sector sits in a quagmire,the more providers that will pull out, and the more potential investors that will not enter.
I have memories of an independent Quality Agency years ago? With a group called the CIS (complaints investigation scheme), from memory they had way too much power and not a lot of knowledge on the industry and it was a disaster. I think it then went back to Commonwealth Govt. There are pros and cons for private v Govt , worth looking at again I guess.